The main conflict involves the legend of a rich boy
humiliated by his classmates who dies in a fire on his birthday. Supposedly, he
reappears every six years as a haunted pinata and sets green fires around town.
The idea of a ghostly pinata sounds far-fetched but perhaps not since Jorge’s
closest friend is an actual chupacabra named Carter. The fiery destruction
around town hits close to home for Jorge and his friends when the butcher shop
owned by Liza’s father is burned to the ground. The plot becomes a mystery that
has no shortage of suspects. However, every time the kids think the clues lead
them to the arsonist something pops up to show them that they must be wrong.
Jorge’s small group of friends presents an interesting
contrast of characters. Liza is the logical, scientific one who only believes
in what can be proven or what she’s actually seen. She obviously scoffs at the
idea of a ghostly pinata setting fires so she drives the investigation into the
legend. Ernie is an anxious friend who’s ready to believe anything that might
scare him. He’s constantly frightened by every rumor or incident even as Liza
collects evidence to debunk the tale. Carter reappears from Mexico and the
chupacabra is determined to utilize his beastly skills to assist his friends.
It’s nice to have a hairy, seven-foot-tall, blood-sucking monster working with
you!
As in the series’ first book, the authors infuse the
narrative with bits of Spanish. Non-Spanish speakers probably won’t know all of
the terms but they’re usually able to use the context of the sentences to
easily figure them out. The phrases are often repeated in English which makes
it very simple to understand. These words are normally included in the characters’
dialogue or as mild exclamations so they sound natural when they’re used. The inclusion
of bits of Spanish enhances the setting and atmosphere of the story since it
takes place in the Southwest region of the United States.
What didn’t work as well:
The kids quickly jump to conclusions when they uncover new
evidence and it’s bothersome how frequently they accuse and dismiss different
suspects. They run through four or five different characters and always seem to
end up back at square one. It especially feels out of character for Liza since
she’s supposed to be the brainiac in the group.
The Final Verdict:
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comments unrelated to the books being described will be removed.